The Dutch language is undergoing a significant change with the inclusion of a new term for labia in the Dikke van Dale dictionary. The term, vulvalippen, will be added alongside the traditional term schaamlippen, which translates to 'shame lips'. This move is part of a broader campaign to eliminate language that carries negative connotations about women's bodies.
Campaigners, including Shari Klein from the Schaamteloos initiative, argue that language plays a crucial role in shaping perceptions. They believe that adopting more neutral and anatomically correct terms can help reduce stigma and promote body positivity. Esther Van der Valk of the feminist group Dolle Mina emphasizes that this change is not just about words but also about fostering a more positive attitude towards sexuality.
The dictionary's editor, Ton den Boon, notes that vulvalippen is gaining traction in various fields, including media, biology textbooks, and medical leaflets. However, the widespread adoption of the term remains uncertain. The campaigners aim to persuade medical professionals and officials to use the new term in their communications.
Similar efforts have been seen across Europe. In Germany, journalists Gunda Windmüller and Mithu Sanyal initiated a petition to replace Shamlippen with Vulvalippen. Windmüller was motivated by the discomfort women feel during medical examinations due to the shame associated with the term. Although the German dictionary has yet to adopt the new term, it is appearing in conversations and educational materials.
Sweden has also witnessed linguistic changes. In 2009, the term mödomshinna, meaning 'maidenhood skin', was replaced with slidkrans, or 'vaginal corona', in response to a campaign by the RFSU. This change aimed to dispel myths surrounding the hymen and virginity. Sonja Ghaderi of the RFSU highlights the importance of challenging social constructs through language.
In the UK, a similar movement is underway. Nicola Denson-Elliott, a feminist podcast host, has petitioned to replace 'hysterectomy' with 'uterectomy', arguing that the current term is linked to the outdated notion of hysteria. Linguistics researcher Dr. Beth Malory stresses the need for thorough research before implementing such changes to ensure clarity and understanding.
Dr. Brooke Vandermolen, an obstetrician, points out that some medical terms, like 'incompetent cervix', can make women feel blamed for medical issues. She advocates for language that validates and recognizes women's experiences. The Royal College of Midwives has already issued guidance on alternative phrases, but traditional terms still persist, causing distress.
As the Netherlands takes this step towards more inclusive language, it may inspire similar conversations in other countries. The words we choose can have a lasting impact, making people feel seen and respected.
