Scholars,policy experts converged in Beijing on July 6,2026, for 14th World Peace Forum. Focus? Evolving dynamics of China-U.S . relations and their impact on global stability. "China–U.S. Relations and International Stability" panel led by Da Wei,Director at Tsinghua University's Center for International Security and Strategy.
Thomas Fingar from Stanford argued that viewing world affairs solely through China-U.S. rivalry is shortsighted. Regional conflicts,shifting alliances among third countries matter more now. He urged broader international engagement,noting these nations' policies greatly influence both bilateral ties and global stability .
Recent exchanges between China-U.S. leaders were hot topics. Many observed both presidents now describe their relationship as "constructive strategic stability." Wu Xinbo from Fudan University and Yu Tiejun of Peking University see this as a positive step . They think it's move beyond "decoupling," "de-risking" rhetoric. More dialogue,collaboration in AI,arms control could follow.
But some experts remain skeptical. Clifford Kupchan,Eurasia Group's Chairman Emeritus,gave cautious take,calling U.S.-China ties "competitive coexistence." He pointed out recent efforts focus on setting boundaries to prevent conflict,not enhancing cooperation. Kupchan likened it to Cold War days,managing issues amid strategic rivalries .
Sun Yun, Director of China Program at Stimson Center,highlighted differing interpretations of "constructive strategic stability" between Beijing and Washington. China favors cooperation,while U.S. stresses risk management,crisis prevention. Future of China-U.S. relations? Could hinge on President Trump's approach,China's growing influence…
