Home/MARKETS/INDIA/Article
MARKETS

Leslie’s and Sadot Group stock performance compared in May 2026 analysis

Leslie’s Inc. reported a gross revenue of $1.24 billion but faced a net loss of $236.97 million, resulting in a net margin of -22.64%. Despite its financial struggles, analysts view Leslie’s more favorably than Sadot Group, which generated $246.90 million in revenue with a larger net loss of $93.39 million.

BRIC Team
BRIC Team
May 30, 2026 · 2 min read
Leslie’s and Sadot Group stock performance compared in May 2026 analysis

Key Takeaways

  • Leslie’s reported a gross revenue of $1.24 billion but faced a staggering net loss of $236.97 million.
  • Sadot Group generated $246.90 million in revenue with a smaller net loss of $93.39 million.
  • Leslie’s has a beta of 1.53, making its stock 53% more volatile than the S&P 500.
  • Analysts rate Leslie’s with a consensus score of 1.86, indicating a potential downside of 25.39%.
  • Approximately 13.3% of Sadot Group’s shares are held by institutional investors, reflecting strong confidence in its future.

Leslie’s Inc. and Sadot Group Inc. are both small-cap companies operating in distinct sectors of the consumer staples market, yet their financial performances reveal stark contrasts. A recent analysis highlights key differences in profitability,risk,and market perceptions of these two firms.

Leslie’s, which specializes in pool and spa care products, reported a gross revenue of $1.24 billion. However,it faced a significant net loss of $236.97 million,resulting in a net margin of -22.64%. The company’s earnings per share stood at -$29.69,with a price-to-earnings ratio of -0.13. In contrast, Sadot Group,which focuses on agri-commodity trading and supply chain solutions,generated $246.90 million in revenue but recorded a smaller net loss of $93.39 million,leading to a net margin of -37.82%. Its earnings per share were -$14.98, with a price-to-earnings ratio of -0.18.

In terms of volatility, Leslie’s exhibits a beta of 1.53, indicating its stock is 53% more volatile than the S&P 500. Sadot Group, on the other hand, has beta of 0.75, suggesting it is 25% less volatile than broader market. This difference in volatility may influence investor sentiment and risk assessments for both companies .

Analyst recommendations further illustrate the contrasting outlooks for these firms. Leslie’s has garnered consensus rating score of 1.86,with two sell ratings, four holds,and one buy . Its target price is set at $2.85,implying a potential downside of 25.39%. Conversely, Sadot Group holds lower rating score of 1.00, with one sell rating and no buy or hold recommendations. This disparity indicates that analysts view Leslie’s as the more favorable investment despite its challenges.

Institutional ownership also varies significantly between the two companies. Approximately 13.3% of Sadot Group’s shares are held by institutional investors, reflecting confidence from larger financial entities. In contrast,Leslie’s has only 0.5% of its shares owned by company insiders, with Sadot Group having 0.4% insider ownership. Strong institutional backing for Sadot Group may suggest belief in its long-term potential,despite current financial struggles.

Founded in 1963 and based in Phoenix, Arizona, Leslie’s operates as a direct-to-consumer brand, offering a wide range of pool and spa supplies, maintenance products, and services. The company also provides e-commerce options and in-store water testing services for its customers.

Sadot Group,established in 2019 and headquartered in Fort Worth,Texas, focuses on addressing global food security challenges through its supply chain solutions. company engages in sourcing and trading food commodities, including soybean meal, wheat, and corn,while also managing farm operations in Southern Africa .

In summary,while Leslie’s outperforms Sadot Group in most financial metrics,including revenue and analyst ratings,Sadot Group’s lower volatility and institutional ownership present a different investment narrative. contrasting profiles of these companies underscore the complexities within the consumer staples sector, where financial health and market perceptions can diverge significantly.

#business

Share this article

Related Articles

South Indian states finalize regulations for agricultural land transactions

South Indian states finalize regulations for agricultural land transactions

Karnataka has implemented strict regulations on agricultural land purchases, allowing only non-agriculturists with an annual income exceeding ₹25 lakhs to buy land. In contrast, Tamil Nadu permits families of five to own up to 15 acres, highlighting the varying approaches to land ownership across southern India.

BRIC Team

May 30, 20260
Kishan Reddy blames Telangana government for paddy procurement failures hurting farmers

Kishan Reddy blames Telangana government for paddy procurement failures hurting farmers

Union Minister G. Kishan Reddy criticized the Telangana government on Saturday for its poor management of paddy procurement, revealing that only 7,180 of the announced 8,775 centers are operational. He highlighted that farmers are facing delays of 20 to 40 days in selling their produce, leading to distress sales at prices as low as ₹1,700 per quintal.

BRIC Team

May 30, 20261 views
US International Development Finance Corp targets China's Belt and Road Initiative with new investments

US International Development Finance Corp targets China's Belt and Road Initiative with new investments

The US International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) is expanding its portfolio cap to US$205 billion to counter China's Belt and Road Initiative. This strategic shift allows the DFC to enhance its funding capabilities across over 100 countries, focusing on critical minerals essential for technology and renewable energy industries.

BRIC Team

May 30, 20260
Finance Ministry reports cautious resilience in India's near-term economic growth outlook

Finance Ministry reports cautious resilience in India's near-term economic growth outlook

The Finance Ministry of India released its Monthly Economic Review on Saturday, projecting a cautious economic outlook for May 2026 amid challenges from a below-normal monsoon. The report highlights the need for agile policy responses to address rising inflation pressures and the impact of global energy prices on the Indian economy.

BRIC Team

May 30, 20260
Government exempts import duty on cotton imports until October 30, 2026

Government exempts import duty on cotton imports until October 30, 2026

The Indian government has announced a temporary exemption from customs duties on cotton imports, effective from June 1, 2026, until October 30, 2026. This measure aims to alleviate input costs for the textile industry, benefiting small and medium enterprises while considering the interests of domestic farmers.

BRIC Team

May 30, 20260
Nissos Keros tanker carrying 270,000 MT of crude oil for India crosses Strait of Hormuz

Nissos Keros tanker carrying 270,000 MT of crude oil for India crosses Strait of Hormuz

India has delivered approximately 1.80 crore LPG cylinders over the past four days, exceeding the 1.78 crore bookings made during that time. This logistical achievement is crucial for maintaining energy supply as the government reassures citizens about fuel accessibility amid rising geopolitical tensions in West Asia.

BRIC Team

May 30, 20260